The purpose of the Collaboration Circle is to ensure that coordination and collaboration takes place within the Findhorn Ecovillage Community whenever it is appropriate.
More specifically its role is:
- To strengthen the community and its organisations through coordination and collaboration based on an awareness of the purpose and functioning of the whole community.
– For example, through information sharing, supportive advice (when requested) and initiating collaboration, action or joint operations amongst well-defined groups on specific projects or areas.
- To strengthen the community by addressing and tending to important whole community issues that individual groups or organisations are not able to handle as well separately.
– In response to these issues, suggest clear directions for the community – whether in the form of visions, directions, statements, policies or working groups and shared platforms for communication and action.
The focus of the circle is to nurture collaboration and provide leadership when needed. It is not a governance body. The ColCi can thus provide leadership and direction, but cannot make decisions that are binding for its members or the community’s members. The Circle’s recommendations only have authority over its members’ operations if they decide to adopt them as their own policy.
The circle, which meets for 2 hours every second month, is composed of representatives of the main organisations of the Findhorn Ecovillage, not of individual community members. Each organisation has one member.
Member organisations include:
- Incorporated organisations that provide goods or services to a significant number of Findhorn Ecovillage residents
- Associations whose role is to serve and represent the interests of a significant number of ecovillage residents.
If any member of the group misses 3 meetings in a row, they will be asked to appoint an alternative representative, unless the circle decides otherwise.
Other organisations and individuals can take part in working groups and other collaborations held or initiated by the circle. They can also be invited to circle meetings as and when needed.
Applications to join the Collaboration Circle can be submitted to the focalisers through , detailing how the organisation fulfils the membership criteria of the circle and why their inclusion would be helpful. The decision to accept or reject an application is made by the Collaboration Circle at the first subsequent meeting.
If an organisation wants to leave the Collaboration Circle, this is to be communicated in writing to the focalisers through and reported at the subsequent meeting. Membership fees for the current year will not be refunded.
Current members (January 2022)
Alex Walker (NFD)
Anna Kovasana (co- focaliser)
Anni Broadhead (THA)
Caroline Matters (FF)
David Hammond (Phoenix)
Eian Smith (Duneland)
Fasil Bogale (Ekopia)
Gordon McAlpine (Moray Carshare & co-focaliser)
Jonathan Caddy (Findhorn Hinterland Trust)
Lorraine Rytz-Theriault (NFA)
Maggie La Tourelle (CCC)
Roger Doudna (PET)
From 2015 to 2017 a Community Change Workgroup explored whether it was time for some major changes in the Findhorn Ecovillage Community, due to the increase in its size and complexity. One of their main conclusions was the need for a Community Coordination Circle composed of representatives from the main stakeholder organisations in the community. During this group’s ensuing discussions with the community it became clear to them that the community was not ready for such a step. So instead they proposed 2 strands of action:
- Strand 1: The formation of a so-called Enquiry Circle to continue to build relations and mutual understanding amongst community organisations by working together on a set of predefined topics to test and learn if and how better coordination could be achieved.
- Strand 2: The activation and strengthening of the transformational field of the community through events that encourage dialogue, strengthening of the spiritual base and a sense of shared responsibility and identity.
The tasks given to the enquiry circle were:
- To clarify the purpose of the community in alignment with what unfolds in strand 2;
- To suggest a name for the community;
- To progress some project work on a significant community issue;
- To reflect on their learning journey to help inform emergent governance systems.
The first Enquiry Circle meeting was held in April 2017 and the circle ran until September 2019, when it decided to continue with the expanded role described above and call itself the Collaboration Circle (ColCi).
- Whole Community Purpose Statement: By November 2017 the group had agreed on a version of this which was then circulated to the community for feedback. This has generally been positive, and the statement is now being broadly used in the community, e.g. at the start of meetings, to create a common sense of focus.
- Housing Direction Statement: By June 2018 the group had agreed on a draft version of this.
Housing: The community issue that the Enquiry Circle chose to focus on was housing. This happened at the time when there was a lot of conflict around the Duneland development of North Whins: some people in the community were criticising Duneland for their approach, and some suggesting the development of North Whins should be taken over by a different body. The community was clearly not united about what was the best way forward at North Whins.
ColCi therefore set up a working group to see if we could synthesise all the views being expressed into a vision of what sort of housing the community needed, and thus offer the community a sense of direction. This group included relevant members from outside the collaboration circle and consisted of: Gordon McAlpine (MCS), Stephen Couling (PET), Iris Toister( FF), Owen Jarvis (NVG, FF, YPI) & Cornelia Featherstone (CCC).
Our aim was to have the statement ratified by all the organisations who were members of ColCi. However, not all of the boards involved were able to find the time for this, and it was therefore never openly published within the community. We learnt from this that ratifying ColCi reports may be unrealistic, and it could be better in future just to publish them as the combined thinking of the ColCi circle.
In practice, the process of creating the statement was certainly of help to Duneland in the planning of the North Whins development, and the master plan for this was pretty well aligned with ColCi’s direction statement.
Local Development Plan 2020: In March 2018 the Enquiry Circle met to discuss a response to The Moray Council’s consultation about the Local Development Plan 2020 in relation to a proposal for the development of residential and holiday accommodation on the field at Cullerne Farm. As a result the Findhorn Foundation made a formal response to the Council on behalf of the community. In the end the proposal was rejected by the Council and did not appear in the new Local Development Plan. The discussions also included a meeting with our neighbour, Edward Bichan, who expressed a strong willingness to collaborate with the community were any development to go forward.
Mental Health Strategy Group: In 2019 ColCi endorsed the setting up of the Mental Health Strategy Group, recognising the importance of a cross-organisational mental health strategy in our community. And we agreed that each of the member organisations would actively engage with the development and implementation of policies and procedures to enhance and safeguard mental health and well-being in our community.
COVID Action Group: was created by ColCi in March 2020 to provide a forum to facilitate community responses and initiatives in relation to the Covid pandemic.
DevCom: At the June 2021 ColCi meeting the Findhorn Foundation reported that its trustees had set up the DevCom group in order to explore the next stage of development at The Park, especially with regard to the future of FF assets that are used by the community at large. Over half of the Collaboration Circle members subsequently became members of this group. As the remit of DevCom is very related to the remit of ColCi it was also agreed that DevCom would provide progress reports for each forthcoming ColCi meeting, and that minutes of DevCom meetings would be made available to all the members of ColCi.
Carbon Neutral by 2030: In September 2021 we agreed to endorse a grant application, written by Roger Doudna and Goran Wiklund, for a feasibility study on how to make the Findhorn Ecovillage carbon neutral by 2030. And we set up a subgroup to initiate and steer this project. The group has been successful in obtaining a £10,000 grant from the lottery fund. And in October it held a Sunday Slot where the Energy Masterplan for The Park was presented for discussion within the community. This master plan had already been developed by Paddy Atkinson through the Energy Technology Partnership. The steering group is currently advertising for a project manager. Once that appointment is made, another Sunday Slot will be held to engage community support for the project.
Community Name: One of the tasks given to the Enquiry Circle by the CCWG was to suggest a name for the community. The Collaboration Circle now has a proposal ready to take to the community for a thorough discussion, and will present this at the community meeting on 10th January 21. The proposed name is “Findhorn Ecovillage Community”. The word Community indicates that this also includes people who do not live at the ecovillage, but who are involved in the community and the unfolding of the impulse started by Dorothy, Eileen and Peter. This name is primarily intended for use when communicating with people outside the community. And alongside this name, we imagine that terms like “The Park” and “Findhorn Ecovillage” would continue to be used within the community to describe the settlement based around the caravan park.
Follow the link above to access Minutes of the Collaboration Circle Meetings. Minutes are added to this shared Google Drive from time to time.